US just blocked the tools Huawei needed to make local chips

Until now, US export controls targeted the end product — blocking Huawei from buying Nvidia's H100 chips, cutting TSMC off from supplying advanced processors to Chinese customers. A bipartisan bill introduced in April 2026 changes the strategy entirely. Instead of targeting chips, it targets the machines used to make them.

If passed, the bill would ban US-approved sales of DUV (Deep Ultraviolet) lithography equipment and etching tools to Huawei, SMIC, and other leading Chinese semiconductor firms. That single sentence could delay China's domestic chip ambitions by a decade.

The Upstream Chokepoint No One Fully Anticipated

Previous US chip restrictions operated at the delivery stage. The SAFE Chips Act (December 2024) banned AI accelerator exports like Nvidia's H20 and AMD's MI308 through 2028. The Remote Access Security Act (January 2026) closed the loophole of accessing restricted chips via offshore cloud servers. Both approaches tried to stop China from using advanced chips.

This bill targets something fundamentally different: the manufacturing equipment itself. DUV lithography (a fabrication process that uses deep ultraviolet light — extremely short-wavelength, high-energy light — to etch nanoscale circuit patterns onto silicon wafers) is the foundational step in producing any modern semiconductor. Without these machines, a chip factory cannot manufacture advanced chips. There is no workaround.

Earlier bills banned someone from driving a car. This one bans them from buying the car — and shuts down the factory that builds it.

Export Control Escalation Timeline
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
2019 May  → Huawei placed on US Entity List
2020 Sep  → TSMC barred from supplying Huawei chips
2020 Dec  → SMIC placed on US Entity List
2022–24   → Advanced AI chip (H100, A100) exports banned
2023 Aug  → Huawei Kirin 9000S 7nm chip shocks policymakers
2024 Dec  → SAFE Chips Act: bans H20/MI308 exports through 2028
2026 Jan  → Remote Access Security Act: closes cloud loophole
2026 Apr  → New bipartisan bill: targets DUV lithography tools ← HERE
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

What DUV Lithography Actually Does — And Why ASML Has No Competitor

A lithography machine (essentially a nanoscale projector that uses light to print billions of transistors onto a chip) is the most expensive and complex piece of equipment in any semiconductor fab. The world's only manufacturer of advanced lithography systems is ASML (Advanced Semiconductor Materials Lithography), a Dutch company headquartered in Veldhoven, Netherlands, employing approximately 42,000 people worldwide and commanding roughly 80% of the global lithography market.

ASML builds two categories of machines central to this bill:

• EUV (Extreme Ultraviolet) — used for the most advanced sub-5nm chips. Each machine costs $200–$380 million and was already banned from export to China under US-brokered agreements with the Dutch government starting in 2023.
• DUV (Deep Ultraviolet) — used for 7nm–28nm production nodes (a "node" describes transistor size in billionths of a meter; smaller means faster and more power-efficient chips). Each machine costs $50–$100 million. These are what the new bill targets.

Sub-7nm capability — transistors smaller than 7 billionths of a meter, roughly 1,000 times thinner than a human hair — separates cutting-edge AI processors from commodity chips. The global semiconductor equipment market was valued at approximately $109 billion in 2024, with lithography machines representing the highest-value segment of that total.

The 2023 Shock That Made This Bill Inevitable

When Huawei launched the Mate 60 Pro in August 2023, teardown analysis revealed a Kirin 9000S chip running a 7nm-class manufacturing process — produced by SMIC using DUV machines. Washington was alarmed: China had built an advanced chip using tools that weren't fully restricted. That single revelation is the direct cause of this bill.

SMIC (Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation) is China's largest domestic chip foundry (a chip foundry is a factory that manufactures chips to specification for other companies — the same way a print shop produces documents it didn't write). It was placed on the US Entity List in December 2020, limiting its access to American technology. Despite that restriction, SMIC pushed its manufacturing capability toward 7nm using DUV equipment already in its possession.

Huawei itself was placed on the Entity List in May 2019 and cut off from TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, the world's most advanced chip maker) in 2020. Forced to pivot, Huawei turned to SMIC — and the Kirin 9000S proved that the export control architecture had a critical gap. This bill is Washington's attempt to seal it permanently.

The Revenue Numbers Make ASML's Position Deeply Uncomfortable

• ASML's total equipment revenue in 2024 reached approximately €28.3 billion.
• China represented roughly 36% of ASML's revenue — approximately €10.2 billion — its single largest market.
• A comprehensive DUV export ban could reduce ASML's annual revenue by an estimated €5–10 billion, depending on how broadly restrictions are applied.
• China's government has committed over ¥688 billion (approximately $95 billion) through the China Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund. Without DUV tool access, much of that investment stalls at the manufacturing stage.

The Dutch Connection — And America's Long Arm

ASML is a Dutch company, not an American one — so the US cannot simply order it to stop selling to China. Washington's leverage comes from a different legal mechanism: the Foreign Direct Product Rule (an export control framework that applies US regulations to products manufactured abroad, if those products incorporate significant US-origin technology, components, or intellectual property).

Because virtually all advanced semiconductor equipment — including ASML's DUV machines — contains US-origin optics, control software, and precision components, the Foreign Direct Product Rule gives Washington effective jurisdiction over ASML's export decisions regardless of where the company is headquartered. This is the exact same rule used to bar TSMC from supplying advanced chips to Huawei in 2020.

The Dutch government has already restricted ASML's EUV exports to China following sustained US diplomatic pressure. The new bipartisan bill would deploy the same Foreign Direct Product Rule framework against DUV machines — and this time, without waiting for multilateral negotiations.

Bipartisan Consensus: This Is Strategy, Not Politics

The bill's cross-party support marks a rare moment of political alignment in a divided Congress. The strategic case is clear regardless of party affiliation:

• Advanced semiconductors underpin AI systems, weapons guidance, communications infrastructure, and economic competitiveness at every level.
• A China capable of producing advanced chips domestically is far harder to sanction, slower to contain, and more difficult to compete with.
• Every DUV machine that reaches a Chinese fab today extends that country's production capacity for years — potentially decades.

The progression of US chip controls follows a deliberate escalation: 2022–2024 restricted finished AI chip exports; 2025–2026 closed cloud access and remote compute loopholes; 2026 now targets the manufacturing equipment upstream. China's 14th Five-Year Plan (2021–2025) explicitly targeted semiconductor self-sufficiency — and the US is moving systematically to make that goal unachievable without Western cooperation.

Who Wins, Who Loses, and What Comes Next

A comprehensive DUV restriction reshapes the global semiconductor landscape in ways that ripple far beyond Huawei and SMIC:

• TSMC and Samsung widen their competitive moat further — TSMC's 3nm process (used in Apple's latest iPhones and Nvidia's AI accelerators) relies on EUV machines China already can't access. DUV restrictions cement that advantage for another generation.
• Japan faces secondary pressure — Tokyo Electron manufactures etching tools that complement lithography in chip production. US pressure on Japanese suppliers to align with the new restrictions is virtually certain.
• Beijing holds a retaliatory card — China dominates global production of gallium and germanium, rare earth materials critical for semiconductor manufacturing. Export restrictions on those materials could disrupt Western chip production in response.
• China's domestic chip timeline slips significantly — industry analysts estimate a full DUV block would delay domestic 5nm production by 5–10 years from current projections.

For engineers selecting chips for products, investors tracking semiconductor supply chains, and anyone building with AI — this bill represents another structural inflection point. The chip war has moved all the way upstream: past the finished processor, past the AI accelerator, past the cloud server, to the machines that manufacture the chips themselves. Controlling those machines may be the most decisive chokepoint of all.

Related Content — Get Started | Guides | More News